Thursday, March 31, 2011
I selected Lischer's book for two primary reasons.
First, his experience of being a cultural alien within his own community resonated significantly with my own experience in my first call. The church at New Cana which Lischer served was rural, agricultural, and conservative. It's frame of reference was of the land, and of a community tightly knit by bonds of family. In the context of that community, Lischer's intellectual ethos and his framing of issues through contemporary and ancient philosophy meant that the way he articulated himself simply did not mesh...at first...with the farmers to whom he was pastoring. In chapter seven, he gleefully deconstructs his own initial efforts at preaching. Quoting Camus and Heidigger and poetry meant that for quite a while he failed to click with the rhythms of agricultural and interpersonal life that ".. lay closest to the soul of the congregation..." (p. 75) Reflecting on the absurdity of his situation, Lischer writes: "The church had decreed that henceforth I would be the spiritual guide, public teacher, and beloved sage to people whose lives and work I couldn't possibly understand...what CEO would create a task force in which savvy and self-sufficient farmers subject themselves to the authority of a recent graduate student?" (pp. 49-50)
Within my own church context, that sense of cultural alienation came as my dying and mostly Anglo church worked towards merger with a Korean-American fellowship. I began my ministry with a small cadre of older Presbyterians who were highly literate and intellectually engaged, and with whom I strongly resonated, despite a generational gap. As efforts towards merger proceeded, the congregation became increasingly second-generation Korean-American. While the new membership was intelligent, vibrant, energetic, and passionate, their frame of reference was radically different. References to history and philosophy had folks nodding off. Using literature...even contemporary popular literature...was just not meaningful to a congregation that was functionally and self-admittedly post-literate. That was magnified by the different frame of reference that comes from being the children of immigrants. It's challenging being the "leader" of a church that has radically different expectations of church life.
Second, Lischer's congregation was what might be called a "family congregation" from within the Alban Institute typology (http://www.alban.org/raisingtheroof/changingSize.asp). Most members of the church were somehow related, and as is the case in many small rural congregations, most informal leadership rested in the hands of a patriarch and matriarch. Connections at New Cana were lifelong, intimate, and bore all the hallmarks of extended family, for good and for ill. My current congregation, though young, suburban, and primarily Asian-American, is structured in much the same way. Though not biologically so, it is functionally a family, a single cell where most core members grew up together as part of the same tightly-knit Korean youth group. In the place of a matriarch, there is an unni/noona ("aunt" figure), and the in place of a patriarch, an oppa/hyung ("uncle" figure). In mission studies I've run with the new young adult leadership of the congregation, they've been repeatedly struck by how deeply their collective character reflects the dynamics of that congregational size. In my experiences as the formal "leader" of the community, I've similarly been reminded of what formal "leadership" typically looks like in a family church context.
Lischer's time of leadership at New Cana showed some of his weaknesses as a leader, but also some valuable strengths:
Weakness - Inexperience: Even though Lischer had a significant array of degrees, a good heart, and what seemed like a lifetime of academic training, he really struggled with operationalizing some of the basic mechanics of congregational/spiritual leadership. His initial awkwardness in negotiating the demands of pastoral life often seemed comical in retrospect (particularly the "oops no bread for hospital communion" story on pp. 56-58), but it was likely not so much so while it was occurring.
Weakness - Interpersonal Connection: Coupled with Lischer's inexperience was his significant cultural and personal disconnect with the church. His radically different frame of reference made developing relationships within the community highly challenging. This was driven home to him towards the end of his time with New Cana, as he visited the congregation that would ultimately call him away. He and his wife had become so acclimatized to their status as outsiders within the community that they were stunned that in this new church "...it appeared to take no effort on their part to feel comfortable with us and even to like us as persons." (p. 219)
Strength - Use of Ritual and Formal Authority to Develop Informal Authority: To overcome the interpersonal challenges he faced, Lischer tapped into the ritual and liturgical expectations he shared with his congregation. New Cana may have been socioculturally different, but it had the same "faith vocabulary." Here, Lischer's training in the prayers, sacred rituals, and worship patterns of Lutheran life allowed him to find common ground within his community. Even if he didn't know personally what to say to an elderly couple as the wife was frightened and desperately ill, the prayers he could offer up from their shared tradition established connection and comfort. (p. 63)
By repeatedly speaking from that foundation, and by taking on the role that reflected the expectations of the community, Lischer developed bonds within the church that slowly moved him from being viewed as a questionable outsider to being viewed as part of the fabric of congregational life. That became evident in a disagreement with the patriarch of the church, as during a fierce argument the patriarch declared, "As far as I'm concerned-I mean me, personal-I guess it don't matter...but you are a part of this church." (pp. 100-101) For all of his difference, at that point, Lischer had been included in. Yes, there was an argument. But it was a family argument, drawing it's intensity from a deep desire for connection.
Strength - Love: Perhaps the clearest strength in Lischer's story of his time at New Cana was the depth of love he felt for the church. This was not a "tell-all" book, in which the erudite pastor looks back mockingly at the ignorant rabble that failed to grasp his gifts. Throughout Open Secrets, it is clear that Lischer felt a deep and growing care for the community. You cannot lead if you do not love, or so the saying goes, and Lischer's love for the souls at New Cana was deeply evident. Even as he was called away to a community in which he could serve more effectively as an incarnational leader, his clear sense of loss marked the bonds of compassion he had developed. (p. 220)