Monday, July 16, 2012
Illiterate Sheepherders and the God Particle
One rather...interesting...reflection on this profoundly exciting advance came in a recent article in the WaPo, in which the CEO of Beltway Atheists used the discovery as a reason to assert how ignorant religious people are. This is perhaps unsurprising, given that anything and everything is a reason for anti-theists to assert how stupid faith is. Wake up and have a cup of coffee? Faith is stupid. See a bunny hopping across your lawn? Faith is stupid. One has to appreciate such consistency.
Woven into the pattern of predictable rhetoric was a familiar trope about why the faithful are such remarkable dumb-dumbs. Faith is the product of "illiterate sheepherders." I've heard this one and variants of it many, many times, but thought it was worth taking a moment to reflect on it.
The only reason we believe in God, or so this particular anti-theistic line of reasoning goes, is because toothless half-wit inbred Judean hill people finally took a break from schtupping the livestock to goggle drooly-faced at the fastless deep of the cosmos. Then, in the throes of their glazed eye confusion at the bigness of it all, they just made [stuff] up.
It's heartening red meat stuff for conventions of chip-on-their-shoulder freethinkers, no doubt. But it has the unfortunate character of being completely, materially, and provably incorrect, utterly ungrounded in objective historical-critical research.
For starters, the assertion that "illiterates wrote the Bible" is...well...think about that statement for a moment.
Those who actually wrote the Bible were not, to put it in the most pretentious res ipsa loquitor way, illiterates. Nor were they...with one or two exceptions...people who worked in the fields. Scribes and the literate weren't exactly a dime a dozen in the ancient world, but where they did exist, they were the educated elite. The folks who wrote the Bible were the scholars and trained historians of their era. They were also the poets and musicians and storytellers, and those who observed and critiqued culture.
Were they dead on about the mechanics of the cosmos? No. Were they human beings, gifted with intelligence, creativity, and insights into the nature of what it means to stand in relationship with one another? Of course they were.
Even if one removes the whole God-part of the conversation, the presumption that human beings who lived in the pre-modern era were less human, less creative, and of less worth because they lacked the benefit of space-based telescopes and massive accelerators bugs me a bit.
It's the difference between humanism and anti-theism, I suppose.