I find myself once again lamenting that the American Revolution is over.
It is, you know. We can tell this because for all of the flag-waving and Constitution-thumping that passes for red-meat patriotism in our Republic, we are completely uninterested in any spread of our system of government beyond its current portion of the North American continent.
On the one hand, we proclaim that our form of government is an expression of a universal, the greatest and most marvelous and most...cough..."exceptional" way of living together that humankind has ever discovered. All should look to us, and want to have what we have. On many levels, this is true. Our freedoms are truly God-given.
But our actions as a nation show we really don't believe it.
When a people rise up against tyranny, yearning to breathe free, it does not even begin to occur to us that perhaps...perhaps...one day the United States could be more than just American. The values of our Constitution are not viral, not on a global scale. We are not, gosh, what's the word, "evangelical" about our Republic, not when it comes to actually having others become a part of us. When we reached the rolling breakers of Hawaii, we said "Aloha" to Manifest Destiny.
That's the "Goodbye" Aloha, not the "Welcome to Honolulu International Airport, I'm wearing a grass skirt and giving you flowers" Aloha. Just to be clear.
We do not think that other peoples...of different colors, and speaking different languages, and of different faiths or no faith at all...could ever be a part of "We The People."
It does not even begin occur to us that perhaps the best way to spread freedom would be to stop propping up "our" despots and pouring out military aid, but to say...we have a system of government that will guarantee you the right to be free and to have a voice. Join us! In exchange, you'll get two Senators and as many representatives as you deserve, and equal protection under our laws. We mean what we say, dagnabbit!
In an alternate universe, perhaps that might be true. You know, the one where Puerto Rico was the fifty first state.
But in this universe? Here, it's not even an option. Instead, we continue to prattle on about how wonderful and exceptional we are, while showing the world through our actions that we really don't mean it.
Showing posts with label egypt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label egypt. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
The Shadow of the Sword
As the streets of Egypt continue to roar and rumble with the discontent of the Egyptian people, most of the online chatter I hear from my progressive and liberal brethren and sistren seems to be enthusiastic. Mubarak was, without question, a despot and an autocrat. He was the classic military dictator, ruling his nation through the power of his connection with the armed forces and some pretty heavy-handed police-state unpleasantness. For Americans, he seems no friend of democracy or tolerance.
But the challenge we face as Americans is that he was our despot. His power is a reflection of ours. Mubarak's armed forces were and are largely equipped and trained and supplied by the United States. Those M-1 Abrams tanks we see rumbling the streets of Cairo are built in Egypt under contract with General Dynamics.
Now that Mubarak is certainly gone, the protection his fist of American iron provided to minority groups in Egypt may also soon be gone. Here, I'm thinking of the largest remaining Arab-world population of Christians. The Coptic Christian community is ancient, and is 8 million people strong. It's about 10% of the overall population of Egypt.
They look at the entropy on the streets, and they don't see the Velvet Revolution that freed the former Czechoslovakia from repressive communist rule. They don't see the same peaceful and passionately democratic impetus. It's just anger and frustration at decades of repression and decay. It could be good, sure. That is my hope and prayer. But to my eyes, it is functionally leaderless, a populist venting that could quickly sour. Revolutions against despotism may seem exciting in the abstract, but they are all too frequently horrors, populated by the glazed eyed depredations of Jacobins and Bolsheviks. And the Al-Ikhwan would all too happily take Egypt to that familiar bloodstained room.
The Copts know this. It isn't that they loved Mubarak. There wasn't much to love.
But following the collapse of a despot, elements of a society that have only been held back by the power of the sword can rise up and prey on those they view as enemies, or scapegoats, or unbelievers. The Christian community in Egypt is justifiably worried about this.
It's a reality that we as comfortable American Christians just can't quite grasp. We look to a despot, and we see an oppressor, someone who must be overthrown. But for as much as we hate government...particularly and justifiably dictatorial governments...the chaos engendered by mob rule and the rise of movements that direct popular anger against a convenient "other" are often equally unjust.
For Christian faith, this seems a dilemma of sorts. We have a challenging relationship with power. The power of the sword is not the power of Christ, and has been set against the purposes of his Reign since the moment He challenged it.
But while we do not live by the sword, even the most uncompromisingly committed of us live in its shadow. Take, for example, the Amish. They are, without question, followers of Jesus who take his uncategorical rejection of violence seriously. They will not bring harm to another, even to protect themselves.
Yet they are, as we are, under the protection of the sword as wielded by our Republic. The laws that provide a balance of justice between us, preventing violence and predation, those laws protect...even those of us who have moved on to the one Law.
It has always been...and will remain...an awkward tension.
But the challenge we face as Americans is that he was our despot. His power is a reflection of ours. Mubarak's armed forces were and are largely equipped and trained and supplied by the United States. Those M-1 Abrams tanks we see rumbling the streets of Cairo are built in Egypt under contract with General Dynamics.
Now that Mubarak is certainly gone, the protection his fist of American iron provided to minority groups in Egypt may also soon be gone. Here, I'm thinking of the largest remaining Arab-world population of Christians. The Coptic Christian community is ancient, and is 8 million people strong. It's about 10% of the overall population of Egypt.
They look at the entropy on the streets, and they don't see the Velvet Revolution that freed the former Czechoslovakia from repressive communist rule. They don't see the same peaceful and passionately democratic impetus. It's just anger and frustration at decades of repression and decay. It could be good, sure. That is my hope and prayer. But to my eyes, it is functionally leaderless, a populist venting that could quickly sour. Revolutions against despotism may seem exciting in the abstract, but they are all too frequently horrors, populated by the glazed eyed depredations of Jacobins and Bolsheviks. And the Al-Ikhwan would all too happily take Egypt to that familiar bloodstained room.
The Copts know this. It isn't that they loved Mubarak. There wasn't much to love.
But following the collapse of a despot, elements of a society that have only been held back by the power of the sword can rise up and prey on those they view as enemies, or scapegoats, or unbelievers. The Christian community in Egypt is justifiably worried about this.
It's a reality that we as comfortable American Christians just can't quite grasp. We look to a despot, and we see an oppressor, someone who must be overthrown. But for as much as we hate government...particularly and justifiably dictatorial governments...the chaos engendered by mob rule and the rise of movements that direct popular anger against a convenient "other" are often equally unjust.
For Christian faith, this seems a dilemma of sorts. We have a challenging relationship with power. The power of the sword is not the power of Christ, and has been set against the purposes of his Reign since the moment He challenged it.
But while we do not live by the sword, even the most uncompromisingly committed of us live in its shadow. Take, for example, the Amish. They are, without question, followers of Jesus who take his uncategorical rejection of violence seriously. They will not bring harm to another, even to protect themselves.
Yet they are, as we are, under the protection of the sword as wielded by our Republic. The laws that provide a balance of justice between us, preventing violence and predation, those laws protect...even those of us who have moved on to the one Law.
It has always been...and will remain...an awkward tension.
Labels:
coptic christians,
egypt,
faith,
military,
mubarak,
oppression,
politics,
sword
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)